Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17837 (JHR)

SHYAM RAJWAR ALIAS SHYAMLAL RAJWAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10639/2025 · 2026-06-24

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18521 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10639 of 2025 ---- 1. Shyam Rajwar @ Shyamlal Rajwar, aged about 65 years, Son of Late Briksh Rajway 2. Jitendra Rajwar @ Jitendra Rajwanshi @ Jitendra, aged 34 about, Son of Shyamlal Rajwar @ Shyam Rajwar. Both resident of Village Ghaghra, P.O. Landup, P.S. Hussainabad, District Palamau …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Hadish Ansari, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, A.P.P. ---- 07/Dated: 24th June, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicants, who are in custody since 21.06.2025, have renewed their prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No.255 of 2021, registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Palamau. 3. The prayer for bail of the applicants was earlier dismissed as withdrawn, vide order dated 25.09.2025 passed by this Court in B.A. No.8422 of 2025. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that it is a crime of assault. The charge has already been framed on 01.12.2025, but till date not a single witness has been examined. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicants on bail. Accordingly, the applicants, named above, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two 2026:JHHC:18581 Page | 2 B.A. No.10639 of 2025 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Palamau in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No.255 of 2021, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned Trial Court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated 24th June, 2026 Raja/Uploaded on 25.06.2026