Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:10888
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6987 of 2025 1 - Purushottam Das Tandia S/o Manmohan Das Tandia Aged About 62 Years R/o H.No. 126/1 Nh 43 Soor District - Surguja (C.G.)
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Department Of School Education, Indrawati Bhawan Block-C, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer District- Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Block Development Education Officer Block- Sitapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Shri Krishna Kumar Gupta Posted As Head Master At Middle School Lalati, Block- Batauli District Surguja (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) WPS No. 7067 of 2025 1 - Balram Yadav S/o Shri Raghunath Yadav Aged About 62 Years R/o Amatoli Sundarnagar Sundarnagar Sitapur District - Surguja (C.G.)
---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary Department Pf School Education Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Department Of School Education Indrawati Bhawan Block-C 1st Floor Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer District - Surguja (C.G.) BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN
2 4 - Block Development Education Officer Block- Sitapur District - Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Shri Santosh Shrivastava Posted As Head Master At Middle School Chitabhara Block - Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioners : Mr. Faisal Akhtar, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board 02/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners may be permitted to withdraw these writ petitions.
2. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for petitioners, both the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram