Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17833 (RAJ)

BHAGWAN SAHAI SON OF SHRI GIRRAJ PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8549/2020 · 2026-02-03

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4978] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8549/2020 Bhagwan Sahai Son Of Shri Girraj Prasad, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Ronshi, Tehsil Nadoti Via Shri Mahaveerji, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Irrigation, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Secretary, Village Development And Panchayatiraj Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Director, Panchayatiraj Department, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Executive Engineer, Panchna Irrigation Project Division Karauli (Raj.) 5. Block Development Officer, Block Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Prakash & Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma for Mr. Karanpal Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Paliwal for Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers: “i). By an appropriate writ order and direction of mandamus or in the nature thereof the respondents may be directed to count the service of petitioner from the date of initial appointment i.e. from 01.06.1986 with the all consequential service benefit and after retiral benefit and pay the arrear with interest in the larger interest of justice. ii.) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and [2026:RJ-JP:4978] (2 of 2) [CW-8549/2020] proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. iii) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioners. 2. Petitioner in person has filed an application no. 1/2026 for withdrawal of writ petition in view of subsequent and changed facts of the case with liberty to file fresh one if need be arises. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent(s) submits that earlier there were some disputes between Panchayat Samiti, Mandrayal, District Karauli and the petitioner and thereafter, the petitioner has deposited Rs.8,00,000/- in the Office of Panchayat Samiti, Mandrayal and a letter dated 04.09.2025 (Annexure-1) is issued by the Development Officer of Panchayat Samiti, Mandrayal. He further submitted that now the Department will process the case of pension in accordance with rules. 4. Having considered the submissions and also the application no. 1/2026 the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one, if need so arises in future. 5. Hence, the writ petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /49