Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17833 (HP)

VED PARKASH v. State of Himachal Pradesh

EX.P./1519/2026 · 2026-07-29

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No. 1519 of 2026. Decided on :29 th July , 2026. Ved Prakash ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate, Dr. Nidhi Singh, Advocate and Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl. Advocate General and Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Sunil Gautam, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral). Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Susheel Gautam, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment passed by the Court shall positively be passed by the competent Authority concerned within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed. For compliance of this part of the order, list on 24.08.2026. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge 29th July, 2026. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?