APHC010092712026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5236/2026 Between: S.V. SHESAIAH, , S/O VENKATESHWARULU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION RETIRED GOVT SERVANT RESIDING AT DARSI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.- 523247 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.-522238 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.-523002 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.-523001 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DARSI CIRCLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.-523247 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUDLAMUDI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.-522213 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: M.S.BANU PRASAD RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5236 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- <…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the representation dt 04022026 as arbitrary illegal apart from being voilative of fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles 14 16 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dt 04 02 2026 and pass….= 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri M.S. Banu Prasad Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent police authorities have not considered the representation dated 04.02.2026 submitted by the petitioner. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the petitioner submitted a representation on 04.02.2026. Based on the contents of the said representation, the respondent police conducted an enquiry, during which it was revealed that property disputes are pending between the petitioner and private parties, and that a civil suit in O.S. No.65 of 2024 is already pending before the competent Civil Court at Darsi. In view of the said civil disputes, the respondent police have not acted upon the representation of the petitioner 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5236 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 dated 04.02.2026 and have advised the petitioner to redress his grievance by approaching the competent Civil Court. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies in O.S.No.65 of 2024 before the competent Civil Court at Darsi, in accordance with law. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 03.03.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5236 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 72 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5236 of 2026 Date: 03.03.2026 RSI