Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17822 (ORI)

BAPINI @ BAPINA DEHURY v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/13266/2026 · 2026-05-11

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.13266 of 2026 Bapini @ Bapina Dehury …. Petitioner Mr. P.K. Pradhan, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 11.05.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “In the facts and circumstances stated above, the humble Petitioner respectfully prays that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:- (i) Admit the writ application; (ii) Direct the Opp. Parties to include the petitioner's name in the beneficiary list of Village Raigoda and to sanction and pay the compensation amount as has been paid to the other similarly situated persons of this village Raigoda within a stipulated time frame. p. 2 p. 2 And/ or pass any such other or further writ (s)/order(s)/direction(s) which give complete relief to the Petitioner; And for this act of your kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-7 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti