KAMRUDDIN MIYAN ALIAS KAMRUDDIN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5675/2026 · 2026-06-24
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17822 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17822 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:18430 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5675 of 2026
------
1. Kamruddin Miyan @ Kamruddin Ansari, aged about 63 years, s/o late Md. Sakur Miyan
2. Idris @ Kuddus Ansari, aged about 25 years, s/o Kamruddin Miyan @ Kamruddin Ansari, Both r/o Village-Harhad, P.O. & P.S.-Muffassile Hazaribagh, Dist.-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)
… Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Ms. Lina Shakti, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 24.06.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Muffassile Hazaribagh P.S. Case No.78 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under sections 341/323/ 307/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant by assaulting him with lathi and axe. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. It is then submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.16 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 10.03.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 17 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the
case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribagh, in connection with Muffassile Hazaribagh P.S. Case No.78 of 2017 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
24.06.2026 Gunjan-