2026:UHC:2304 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/847/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Gaurav Singh and Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant Mohd. Mohsin is praying for anticipatory bail in reference to FIR dated 15.07.2025, bearing FIR No. 0253 of 2025, Police Station – Nehru Colony, District Dehradun wherein he has been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 318 (4), 351 (2) read with Section 64 of BNS, 2023. 4. Brief facts of the case are that applicant came in contact with the complainant by showing her that he is hindu by religion and he visited several places with her and developed physical relations with her against her will and subsequently, she came to know that applicant is muslim by religion, then, he threatened her that he will upload her videos on social media. 5. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that allegations as alleged are false and since beginning applicant disclosed about his religion and identity and it is absolutely false that he threatened her to upload her videos on social media. He further argued that with malafide intent applicant has been implicated. 6. The Coordinate Bench on 05.08.2025 granted interim bail and thereafter, a detailed counter affidavit has been filed by the Investigating Officer by enclosing the statement of victim along with medical report, supplementary medical report, statement of doctor. 7. On perusal of the medical report, it reveals that hymn was torn and victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, 2023 also supports the prosecution case. Statement of brother of victim Ravi Kumar also corroborates the prosecution case. In addition to this, statement of other witnesses have been enclosed. 2026:UHC:2304 8. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA submits that on completion of investigation and after collecting all credible evidence, charge sheet has been filed against the applicant and taking into consideration the seriousness of the offence, applicant does not deserve for anticipatory bail. 9. After gone through with the contents of the FIR, statement of victim, doctor and other witnesses, medical report and supplementary medical report, this Court does find any good ground to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. 10. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed being devoid of merit. Interim bail granted by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 05.08.2025 is also vacated. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 01.04.2026 SKS