Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:18457
--1-- A.B.A. No. 3352 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3352 of 2026
----
1. Bihari Mandal, son of Etwari Mandal @ Atawari Mandal @ Etabari Mandal, aged about 35 years, resident of village – Madankatta, Jasho Bandh, PO – Baramsoli, PS – Karon, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand
2. Bhawani Devi @ Bhadvi Devi, daughter of Bihari Mandal, aged about 23 years, resident of village – Madankatta, Jasho Bandh, PO – Baramsoli, PS – Karon, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand
3. Trilochan Mandal, son of Etwari Mandal @ Atawari Mandal @ Etabari Mandal, aged about 42 years, resident of village - Madankatta, Jasho Bandh, PO – Baramsoli, PS – Karon, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand
4. Padda Kumari @ Podda Devi, daughter of Trilochan Mandal, aged about 24 years, resident of village – Madankatta, Jasho Bandh, PO – Baramsoli, PS – Karon, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand
5. Girdhari Mandal, son of Etwari Mandal @ Atawari Mandal @ Etabari Mandal, aged about 50 years, resident of village – Madankatta, Jasho Bandh, PO – Baramsoli, PS – Karon, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand
6. Prmila Devi, wife of Girdhari Mandal, aged about 50 years, resident of village – Madankatta, Jasho Bandh, PO – Baramsoli, PS – Karon, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Satyanshu Shubham, Advocate
:- Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate
2026:JHHC:18457
--2-- A.B.A. No. 3352 of 2026
For the State
:- Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Advocate
---- 02/24.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pathrol P.S. Case No.25 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(2) and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on the allegation of grazing field of the informant by the cattle of this petitioner the altercation took place. He further submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and both the sides have received the injury. He then submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.14 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault is there.
5. Considering that there are case and counter case between the parties and the altercation took place on the allegation that the animal of this petitioner have entered into the field of the informant and graze the field and both the sides have received the injury and further the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed
2026:JHHC:18457
--3-- A.B.A. No. 3352 of 2026
in paragraph No.14 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby
directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur in connection with Pathrol P.S. Case No.25 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 24.06.2026 Sangam/