APHC010093152026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5299/2026 Between: 1. S K HAMEED, S/O LATE KAREEM SAHEB, AGED 60 YEARS,THARAKARAMANAGAR, KARAKAMBADI, RENUGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI-522503 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI.TIRUPATHI DISTRICT-517501 3. THE TAHASILDAR, RENUGUNTA MANDALAM, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT-517501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an order to grant, to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare that the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in passing orders on the PGRS representation Dt 07-04- 2025 submitted by the petitioner to the District Collector 2nd respondent herein, who did not direct the 3rd respondent to pass orders on the same, and representations dt 02-11-2024, 22-01-2025 2 submitted by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent who failed to pass appropriate orders on my land issue which consisted on petitioners PGRS grievance under grievance No. TPT202504076866 Dt 07-04- 2025 pertains to survey no. 199/5 Extent Ac. 1.32 cents in Ammavaripeta Village, Venkatagiri town and Mandal, Tirupathi District, is contrary to Law and arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the constitution of India including the settled Laws and consequently direct the respondents to pass appropriate orders on Petitioners PGRS grievance under grievance No. TPT202504076866 Dt 07-04-2025,representations Dt 02-11-2024, 22-01-2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pass an order to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to pass appropriate orders on Petitioner’s PGRS grievance under grievance No. TPT202504076866 Dt; 07-04-2025, submitted to 2nd respondent, representations Dt; 02-11-2024, 22-01-2025 submitted to the 3rd respondent and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Dr MAJJI SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 & 3 in not passing orders on the PGRS representation dt.07.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner to the 2nd respondent who did not direct the 3rd respondent to pass orders on the same, and representations dt.02.11.2024, 22.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner to the 3rd respondent who failed to pass appropriate orders in the land issue of the petitioner which consisted on petitioner’s PGRS grievance under grievance No.TPT202504076866 dt.07.04.2025 pertains to survey No.199/5 to an extent of Ac.1.32 cents in Ammavaripeta village, Venkatagiri town and mandal, Tirupati District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 09.03.2026 submits that already the 3rd respondent issued the endorsement in Rc.B.371/2025, dated 08.07.2025. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition and the petitioner if not received the above said endorsement can collect the same from the office of the 3rd respondent and the same shall be provided immediately to the petitioner. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the said endorsement, 4 it is open for him to assail the same in accordance with law availing alternative remedies. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The written instructions of the 3rd respondent dated 09.03.2026 shall be made as part of the court record. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 10.03.2026 NNN