Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1780 (HP)

ROHIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/5379/2025 · 2026-04-06

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:10303 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 5379 of 2025 Decided on : 06.04.2026 Rohit Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rishi Tandon, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “I. That the instant writ petition may kindly be allowed with cost and the result dated 06.12.2024 (Annexure P-2) and 03.02.2025 (Annexure P-5) in respect to post code 1073 i.e. Operation Theater Assistants may be quashed 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:10303 and set aside as the same is against the principles of fairness and equality; II. That the respondents may be directed to reinitiate the selection process in respect to the sanctioned posts of Operation Theatre Assistants by prior intimation of the criteria/cut-off marks to the candidates.” 2. Perusal of the reply filed by respondent No.3 demonstrates that the petitioner did not obtain qualifying marks in the screening test. 3. In this view of the matter, as the issue raised by the petitioner in the writ petition has lost its efficacy and remains more academic in nature, therefore, present proceedings are disposed of, having become rendered infructuous, but the issues raised therein is kept open. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 06, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)