Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17799 (CHH)

MADAN SINGH PADOTI v. ZILA SHAHKARI KENDRIYA BANK MARYADIT

WPS/10068/2025 · 2026-02-26

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:10423 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10068 of 2025 1. Madan Singh Padoti S/o Late Tejram Padoti Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Haldi, Tehsil Gunderdehi, District Balod (CG) ... Petitioners versus 1. Zila Shahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Ge Road, Opposite Govt. Hospital Durg Acting In The Premises Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Petitioner : Ms. Mitisha Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Abhinav Tiwari, Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 27/02/2026 1. On an objection being raised by learned counsel for respondent that petitioner is having efficacious alternate remedy of filing dispute/case before the Registrar, Cooperative Societies under Section 55 (2) of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, learned counsel for petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy available to petitioner under the law. She, however, submits that a direction be issued to the authority concerned to SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.02.27 18:58:29 +0530 2 consider and decide the dispute/case to be filed by petitioner expeditiously within specified time frame. 2. On due consideration, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty to petitioner to avail efficacious alternate remedy available to him under the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. If a dispute/case is filed by petitioner, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-