J EERANNA @ Y J EERANNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/5229/2026 · 2026-03-02
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17798 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17798 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010095702026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5229/2026 Between:
J EERANNA @ Y J EERANNA, S/O. SUNKANNA, AGE 52 YEARS, OCC REAL ESTATE, R/O. D.NO. 5-1036-11, YALLAMMA BEET, YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.,
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL-518001
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YEMMIGANUR TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360
5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360
6. S G AMPAMMA, W/O. LATE S.G. SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO. 1/179/A, GANDHI NAGAR, YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360
7. Y MUTHYALAMMA, W/O. NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE,
R/O.
D.NO. 5/1036-11, YALLAMMABEEDU,
2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5229 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026
YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360
8. YERUKALA NAGANNA, S/O. Y SUNKANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION,
R/O.
D.NO. 5/1036-9, YALLAMMABEEDU,
YEMMIGANUR TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518360
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- <…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No 4 and 5 are interfering the Civil Disputes Religious activities and forcibly laid fencing around the Temple Premises of Sri Beedumukkala Thayamma Avva Temple and threatening to register false cases if entering in to the Tempel situated at Sy No 511/A of Yemmiganur Village and Mandal as illegal arbitrary and without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 21 191 g of the Constitution of India and consequently to directing the respondent No 4 and 5 not tointerfere in civil disputes AND Religious activities within the premises of Beedumukkala Thayamma Avva Temple situated at Sy No 511/A of Yemmiganur Village and Mandal and pass….=
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3.
Sri Kale Vijaya Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that respondent Nos.4 and 5 are interfering in the civil disputes and religious
3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5229 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026
activities, and are forcibly putting up fencing around the temple premises of Sri Beedumukkala Thayamma Avva Temple, and are threatening to register false cases if the petitioner enters into the temple situated at Sy.No.511/A of Yemmiganur Village and Mandal. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that on 27.01.2026, respondent No.6 lodged a complaint. In connection with the enquiry into the said complaint, respondent Nos.4 and 5 called the petitioner for enquiry, but the petitioner failed to appear and did not cooperate with the enquiry. It is further submitted that respondent Nos.7 and 8 also lodged a complaint against the petitioner, which was registered as a case in Crime No.36 of 2023, and a charge sheet was filed on 20.05.2023 before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yemmiganur. The petitioner is involved in nine criminal cases registered at Yemmiganur Town Police Station. Upon enquiry, it was revealed that civil disputes are pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.4 and 5 not to call henceforth the petitioner at the behest of the unofficial respondents in connection with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5229 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026
6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 03.03.2026 RSI
5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5229 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026
71 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5229 of 2026
Date: 03.03.2026 RSI