Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17796 (CHH)

MANOHAR PANDA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/896/2026 · 2026-02-26

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:10366 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 896 of 2026 Manohar Panda S/o Late Vidyadhar Panda Aged About 55 Years R/o Village - Mugalipali, Tahsil - Sariya, Distt - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Sarangarh, Distt - Sarangarh- Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sub Divisional Officer Sarangarh, Distt - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Tahsildar Sariya, Distt - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Cooperative Society Lodhiya, Distt - Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 27.02.2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record relating to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus and direct the respondent No.3 BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.02.28 16:38:18 +0530 2 and 4 to enter the petitioner name online as registered owner. 10.3 Any other relief deems fit just and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. 10.4 Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner.” 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the concerned Revenue authority for registration of his name in Kissan Portal. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents/State has no objection on the above prayer. 4. On due consideration, prayer is allowed and he is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as prayed for. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini