Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010010252026 2026:GAU-AS:1052 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./224/2026 KAMAL UDDIN LASKAR S/O LATE ANWAR UDDIN LASKAR VILL. NIZ KATIGORAH PART III, PS KATIGORAH, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M S MAZUMDER, A W BARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS O R D E R 29.01.2026 Heard Mr. AMS Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State. 2. This application has been filed under section 483 of BNSS praying for Page No.# 2/3 granting bail to the accused petitioner in connection with Session Case No. 293/2025 under Section 332(b)/74/75(i)(iv)/76/79/296(b)/351(2)/62 BNS arising out of Katigorah P.S. Case No. 63/2025 (G.R. Case No. 1539/2025). The accused petitioner was arrested on 17.09.2025. 3. The gist of the allegations in the FIR is that on 15.09.2025 which was lodged by the alleged victim woman with allegations that on 15.09.2025 in the evening the accused trespassed into her house and tried to outrage her modesty. It is further alleged that the accused regularly urinates on her door and fencing and makes illicit proposal to stay with him and also threatens her and her mother. 4. The investigation of the case resulted in a charge-sheet being C.S. No. 52/2025, dated 26.09.2025, a copy of which has been annexed with the petition. 5. I find that only four witnesses are listed in the charge-sheet. The trial has commenced against the petitioner vide Sessions Case No. 293 of 2025 under Section 332(b)/74/75(i)(iv)/76/79/296(b)/351(2)/62 BNS arising out of Katigorah P.S. Case No. 63/2025 and out of the four witnesses, two witnesses including the informant/victim have already been examined. 6. Considering the length of detention and the progress of trial, I am of the considered view that subject to suitable conditions to address the safety concerns of the victim, the petitioner can be allowed to go on bail, at this stage. 7. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is hereby allowed to go on bail of Rs. 40,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned learned Court and subject to the conditions that, (i) He shall be available for the remaining trial, Page No.# 3/3 (ii) He shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence. (iii) He shall not in any manner intimidate, harass or harm to the informant/victim or any witnesses. 8. In case of violation of the bail condition, his interim bail would be liable to be cancelled. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant