Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1779 (BOM)

PUNEETA SHARMA (AGRAWAL) v. RAVI MUKESH AGARWAL

IA/5789/2026 · 2026-07-31

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

911- IA 5789 of 2026.doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 5789 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4237 OF 2026 Mrs. Puneeta Agarwal (Sharma) ...Applicant/ Petitioner Vs. Mr. Ravi Agarwal and Anr. ...Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Inderpal Singh, Advocate for Applicant. Ms. Pradyumna Agrawal a/w. Bhushan Shinde a/w. Anshu Agrawal i/by Pushpa Ganediwala & Co. for Respondents. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 31st JULY, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP. 2. By this application, the applicant is seeking four days condonation of delay in filing the written statement and seeks leave to file additional written statement. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent strongly objected to allow the interim application on the ground that applicant is prolonging the matter before the Family Court. 4. I have heard both learned counsel. As applicant wants to file VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.08.04 12:01:55 +0530 911- IA 5789 of 2026.doc Tikam written statement in support of his contention, application is allowed, 5. Four days delay in filing the written statement is condoned. 6. Applicant shall file additional written statement, if any, within two days after receipt of this order. 7. Applicant shall pay cost of Rs.5,000/- to Kirtikar Law Library. 8. Applicant shall not ask for any copy from the other side. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)