RAJDIP KUMAR ALIAS RAJDIP KUMAR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5751/2026 · 2026-06-24
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17784 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17784 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:18496] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5751 of 2026
------ Rajdip Kumar @ Rajdip Kumar Saw, aged about 31 years, son of Rameshwar Saw, Resident of Vill- Chamatu, P.O. Ganeshpur and P.S.- Balumath, Dist- Latehar. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-24-06-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.233 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111(4), 111(6), 308(4), 308(6), 61, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons while planning to collect levy money and firing upon persons engaged in coal loading, they were planning to commit major crime and on seeing the police party, they tried to flee away but the co- accused persons who were apprehended by the police, disclosed the name of the petitioner to be also involved in those offences. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case and charge has also been framed but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.02.2026 as is evident from para-24 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Latehar in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No.233 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 24.06.2026 Saroj/