Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17778 (AP)

KARRI MULLAYA @ JAGANNDHAM v. SRI M N HARENDHIRA PRASAD

CC/1622/2025 · 2026-01-30

R Raghunandan Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010095672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1622/2025 Between: 1. KARRI MULLAYA @ JAGANNDHAM, S/O. NARASIMHAM, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, PLOT NO.231, B-BLOCK, LEMARTHY, AGNAMPUDI, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI M N HARENDHIRA PRASAD, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. SMT P SREELEKHA, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. SMT THOTE SRI VALLI, THE TAHSILDAR, GAJUWAKA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SMT S D ANITHA, THE SPECIAL GRADE DEPUTY COLLECTOR, R AND R A.P.I.I.C., ATCHUTHAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful violation of the order passed by this Honble Court in WP.MP No. 57736 of 2016 in WP.No. 46878 of 2016, dated 03.01.2017 to pass 2 RRR,J C.C.No.1622 of 2025 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI 2. 3 RRR,J C.C.No.1622 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: This Court, by an Order, dated 03.01.2017, in W.P.No.46878 of 2016, had directed status quo to be maintained, in relation to plot bearing No.86 situated in B-Block in Jawaharlal Nehru Pharmacity Layout, in Sy.No.231 of Agnampudi, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court, by way of the present Contempt Case, on the ground that, the respondents herein, had come to the said plot, on 14.02.2025, for the purpose of identifying the plots, which can be allotted to third parties. However, they left the place, upon being informed of the Order and with a statement that, they would be go back with the possession of the plot. This Contempt Case has been filed in February, 2025. 3. The 3rd respondent, after notice, have filed a counter-affidavit, in which it is stated that, neither himself nor his staff had inspected the said location, on 14.02.2025. It is also stated that, there is no intention to disobey the Orders of this Court. 4. As the status quo directed by this Court has not been disturbed, nothing further would remain in the present Contempt Case. 5. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner in the event of any future difficulty. 4 RRR,J C.C.No.1622 of 2025 As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J KPV 5 RRR,J C.C.No.1622 of 2025 221 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1622 of 2025 31.01.2026 KPV