Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17776 (JHR)

SATTAN RAUT @ SATYANARAYAN RAUT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3381/2026 · 2026-06-24

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18546] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3381 of 2026 1. Sattan Raut @ Satyanarayan Raut, Aged about 65 years, Son of Chhedi Raut, Resident of Village- Debandha, P.O.-Debandha, P.S.-Poraiyahat, Dist.- Godda. 2. Jaikant Raut @ Jaykant Raut, Aged about 72 years, Son of Chhedi Resident Raut, of Village-Debandha, P.O.-Debandha, P.S.- Poraiyahat, Dist.-Godda. 3. Narayan Yadav, Aged about 31 years, Son of Satyanarayan Yadav, Resident of Village- Debandha, P.O.-Debandha, P.S.-Poraiyahat, District-Godda. 4. Sewak Yadav @ Sevak Yadav, Aged about 26 years, Son of Satyanarayan Yadav, Resident of Village- Debandha, P.O.-Debandha, P.S.-Poraiyahat, Dist.- Godda. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Indu Shekhar Gupta, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 24.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Godda (M) Motiya P.S. Case No. 40 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 333, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the informant are agnates and there is land dispute between them and further there is case and counter case between the parties and first case has been lodged by the petitioners’ side. He next [2026:JHHC:18546] -2- submits that the received injuries are said to be simple in nature. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioners. 4. Learned A.P.P appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of making assault. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. There are case and counter case between the parties and both the sides are agnates and further the injuries are said to be simple in nature and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda, in connection with Godda (M) Motiya P.S. Case No. 40 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-24.06.2026 Amitesh/-