Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17776 (DEL)

SH. MOHIT KUMAR SINGH v. STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

W.P.(CRL)/2774/2026 · 2026-09-09

Prateek Jalan

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(CRL) 2774/2026 $~106 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010425022026 + W.P.(CRL) 2774/2026 & CRL.M.A. 27865/2026 SH. MOHIT KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Kr. Sharma, Mr. Parveen Tyagi, Mr. Ujjawal Tyagi, Ms. Nishu Tyagi, Mr. Krishn Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC. SI Ravi Nawal, PS-Rajouri Garden. Ms. Sonal Gupta, Mr. Vanshaj Tyagi, Ms. Simran Singh, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 09.09.2026 1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner assails the notices dated 13.06.2026, 21.07.2026 and 26.07.2026 issued by Police Station Rajouri Garden, requiring him to join the investigation pursuant to a complaint made by respondent No. 2. 2. Mr. Puneet Kr. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the complaint of respondent No. 2 pertains to an immovable property situated in Roorkee, District Haridwar, Uttarakhand, which was This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/09/2026 at 18:01:27 W.P.(CRL) 2774/2026 bequeathed to the petitioner by way of a registered Will dated 10.08.2021, alongwith a General Power of Attorney executed in his favour by the erstwhile owner, Smt. Rekha Chadha, who expired on 19.10.2025. 3. Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State, submits that the matter is presently at the stage of preliminary enquiry and that no FIR has been registered as yet. He further submits that, upon the petitioner joining the enquiry and furnishing the necessary documents, the Investigating Officer would be in a position to assess the matter and take a decision as to whether an FIR is required to be registered and, if so, under which provisions of law. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission, Mr. Sharma does not press the present petition at this stage, while reserving the petitioner’s rights and remedies in accordance with law at the appropriate stage. 5. The petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as not pressed, in terms of the above. 6. It is made clear that this Court has expressed no opinion on the merits of the case. PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 ‘B’/SD/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/09/2026 at 18:01:27