Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17775 (MAD)

Krishnaveni B v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/5750/2026 · 2026-03-02

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.5750 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.No.5750 of 2026 B.Krishnaveni ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The District Revenue Officer, DRO Office, Collector Campus, Dindigul. 3. The Revenue Divisional officer, RDO Office, Sub Collector Officer Road, Dindigul. 4. The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul East Taluk, Natham Road, Dindigul. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5750 of 2026 5. N.Nallu Naidu ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry and rectifying the Patta in respect of Survey No.496/14C, A. Vellode Village, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District by the way of the petitioner representation dated 27.01.2026 within a time fame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumarr For Respondents : M/s.S.Jeya Priya Government Advocate (R1 to R4) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry and rectifying the Patta in respect of Survey No.496/14C, A. Vellode Village, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District based ion the representation of the petitioner dated 27.01.2026. 2. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submitted that the properties in question are joint family properties, and that an oral partition took place between the petitioner's father and his brother. Following the demise of the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5750 of 2026 petitioner's father, the petitioner has been cultivating the land without any interference. The learned counsel further submitted that during the UDR process, the patta for the property was mistakenly transferred to the 5th respondent, who is the petitioner's father's brother. It was submitted that the 5th respondent had already been allocated his share of the property as per the oral partition and has been separately enjoying his portion. The petitioner now seeks to rectify this error caused by the Revenue Authorities during the UDR proceedings by issuing a separate patta and subdividing the property. 3. Heard the learned Government Advocate representing respondents 1 to 4. 4. Considering the facts, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to conduct an enquiry after issuing notice to the petitioner and 5th respondent and shall pass appropriate orders within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5750 of 2026 5. With these directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of . No costs 02.03.2026 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No msrm To 1. The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2. The District Revenue Officer, DRO Office, Collector Campus, Dindigul. 3. The Revenue Divisional officer, RDO Office, Sub Collector Officer Road, Dindigul. 4. The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul East Taluk, Natham Road, Dindigul. 5. The Government Advocate, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5750 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY, J msrm Order made in W.P.(MD)No.5750 of 2026 02.03.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis