Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17773 (RAJ)

JAKIR MOHAMMD QURASHY S/O IBRAHIM MOHAMMD QURASHY v. THE CHIEF SECRETARY (SCHOOL EDUCATION)

CW/8460/2023 · 2026-02-09

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5855] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8460/2023 Jakir Mohammd Qurashy S/o Ibrahim Mohammd Qurashy, Aged About 50 Years, Teacher, Resident Of Neembari, Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.) Employee Id Rjjw199722018144 ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Chief Secretary (School Education), Government Of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director (School Education), Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Joint Director (School Education), Kota Division, Kota. 4. The Chief District Education Officer (School Education), Jhalawar 5. The District Education Officer, Mukhyalaya (Secondary), Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jakir Mohammd Qurashy (present in person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 09/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with following prayer: "It is therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Writ Petition may kindly be allowed and it is further requested that the following relief as under:- a. That in compliance of promotion order (the impugned order No.01) passed by Deputy Director Secondary (Education Department) Kota No. 1219 dated 17.12.2014, the petitioner may kindly be allowed to join as a II grade science teacher. The respondents may kindly be directed to cancel the order no. 265 dated 20.08.2018 (Impugned order no.02) this order is abolishing the unjust prohibition/ [2026:RJ-JP:5855] (2 of 3) [CW-8460/2023] ban imposed by the appellant for not allowing him to join anywhere. b. The respondents may kindly be directed to pass an order granting permission to the appellant for join as a II grade science teacher on any vacant post in compliance of above mention promotion order dated 17.12.2014. c. That the compensation for the writ petition should be made to the petitioner from the respondent. d. Any other appropriate relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem it just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner. " 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that in compliance of order dated 12.01.2026 passed by this Court in the present writ petition, the respondents have considered the candidature of the petitioner for promotion on the post of Teacher Grade-II through DPC and vide order dated 27.01.2026, the petitioner has been granted promotion on the post of Teacher Grade-II against the vacancy year 2013-14. 3. Petitioner appearing in person submits that although, promotion has been granted to the petitioner vide order dated 27.01.2026, however, he is also entitled for all the benefits pursuant to promotion from the vacancy year 2013-14, as the petitioner is not responsible for the delay caused by the respondents in issuing promotion order dated 27.01.2026. 4. Order dated 27.01.2026 is taken on record. 5. Under the aforesaid circumstances, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the writ petition by observing that since, promotion has already been granted to the petitioner therefore, the petitioner would be at liberty to make a representation before the respondents for granting him benefits pursuant to order dated 27.01.2026 w.e.f. year 2014. In case, any [2026:RJ-JP:5855] (3 of 3) [CW-8460/2023] such representation is received by the respondent No.2, same shall be considered and decided by a speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/19