Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17771 (JHR)

ABHISHEK RAWANI ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5709/2026 · 2026-06-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18576 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5709 of 2026 ------ Abhishek Rawani @ Abhishek Kumar, aged about 20 years, son of Tinku Rawani, resident of Tuhatand Hari Mandir, P.O. and P.S.- Dhansar, District-Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K. Chatterjee, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.04 Dated- 24-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.67 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1) & 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the injury sustained by the victim is in abdomen area and is simple in nature. It is also submitted that a compromise has been affected to between the parties and in this respect, the learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this Court to the copy of the certified copy of the compromise petition filed in the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in B.P. No.343 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-13 of this bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.04.2026 as is evident from para-14 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Dhansar P.S. Case No.67 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24/06/2026 Abhiraj/