Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1777 (RAJ)

DINESH KUMAR S/O DILBAG SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14303/2025 · 2026-03-27

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12768] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14303/2025 Dinesh Kumar S/o Dilbag Singh, R/o Bhiman Pana, Near Shyam Temple Farmana Khas Rohtak (Haryana). ----Applicant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 27/03/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, in connection with FIR No.63/2024, registered at Police Station Bhinay, District Kekri for the offences under Sections 8 & 18 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant after arguing for sometime wants to withdraw the present bail application, making a limited prayer that the applicant be permitted to surrender before the concerned Trial Court, who may be directed to consider the plea of the applicant on the same date of making surrender. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has not objected the aforementioned plea. 4. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances, and taking note of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant; however without commenting anything upon the [2026:RJ-JP:12768] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14303/2025] merits/demerits of the case, the present bail application is dismissed as withdrawn; with a direction that the accused- applicant shall surrender himself before the learned Trial Court concerned. The said Court is directed to consider the application so moved, or plea so made by the surrendering accused-applicant on the very same date. 5. It is made clear that the withdrawal of the present bail application shall not cause any prejudice to the applicant’s plea before the concerned Court and he is at liberty to contest his matter qua grant of bail as and when required. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /8