APHC010091132026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5063/2026 Between: 1. M. AARATHI, W/O M. SHIVAPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O 59, MM NIVASA, DOLLARS COLONY, BANDIHATTI ROAD, OPP KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA COWL BAZAR, VTC BELLARY, KARNATAKA-560094 2. N.CHANDRA SEKAR, S/O KANI BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O 28-WARD NO 8, NANDI BASAPPA STREET, BELLARY, KAMATAKA-583101. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P- 522238. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTAPURAM-515001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, D. HIREHAL MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT-515872. 4. S G BASAVARAJU, S/O LATE GANGADHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,R/O MALPANGUDI VILLAGE, D.HIRHEL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT-515872. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5063 of 2026 Dated 06.03.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): BAGGI VENKATA PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in interfering with the civil dispute relating to the land in Survey No.69 admeasuring Ac.4-00 and part of Survey No.68 situated at Malapanagudi Village, D. Hirehal Mandal, despite the subsistence of interim injunction order in O.S. No.227 of 2025, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India Consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and cultivation of the Petitioners over the schedule property and not to compel the Petitioners to remove the standing pomegranate crop Pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri B. Venkata Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that Respondent No. 3 is interfering in a civil dispute pending between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent, wherein an interim injunction has already been granted in favour of the petitioners in O.S. No. 227 of 2025. It is further submitted that Respondent No. 3 is summoning the petitioners to the police station in connection with a purely civil dispute. 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5063 of 2026 Dated 06.03.2026 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that, based on proceedings vide Rc. No. B/07/2026 dated 12.01.2026 received from the Tahsildar, D. Hirehal, Anantapuramu, requesting police protection for fencing and alignment of survey boundaries being undertaken by the petitioner, Respondent No. 3 called the petitioner to the police station. He therefore urges that the writ petition be dismissed. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.3 not to call the petitioners henceforth at the behest of unofficial respondent in connection with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and unofficial respondent and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. However, if any crime is registered against the petitioners, the police are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 06.03.2026 PBS 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5063 of 2026 Dated 06.03.2026 175 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5063 of 2026 Date: 06.03.2026 PBS