Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17765 (PNJ)

HANS RAJ v. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

RFA/1523/2000 · 2026-02-12

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH HANS RAJ STATE OF HARYANA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Chetan Slathia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda HARKESH MANUJA Learned made all sincere efforts, no one appeal. In such circumstances, the present appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 12.02.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Chetan Slathia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite have made all sincere efforts, no one is coming forward In such circumstances, the present appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-1523-2000 Date of Decision: February 12, 2026 ........Appellant ......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Chetan Slathia, Advocate for the appellant. , Addl. A.G. Haryana. counsel for the appellant submits that despite have is coming forward to contest the present In such circumstances, the present appeal is therefore Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2000 February 12, 2026 counsel for the appellant submits that despite have to contest the present In such circumstances, the present appeal is therefore TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.02.13 18:58 I agree to specified portions of this document