PRAKASH CHAND JAIN v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C./5389/2026 · 2026-09-10
Saurabh Banerjee
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17765 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17765 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010339072026 + CRL.M.C. 5389/2026
PRAKASH CHAND JAIN
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Adv. alongwith petitioner in person
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advs. alongwith ASI Rajender
Mr. Anil Vyas and Mr. Kamal, Advs. for R2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R %
10.09.2026
1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.459/2023 dated 21.12.2023 registered at PS: Shahdara under Sections 323/354/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom as the petitioner and respondent no.2 have mutually settled all their disputes vide Settlement Deed dated 04.08.2026.
2. Issue notice.
3. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2026 at 12:38:37
4.
Learned counsel for respondent no.2 also accepts notice and submits that the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
5. This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioner as well as the respondent no.2, who all are present in Court. They affirm the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Deed dated 04.08.2026, whereby the parties have agreed to put a quietus to their disputes. Respondent no.2 hence submits that she does not wish to continue with the aforesaid FIR against the petitioner since she wishes to live her life peacefully.
6. The petitioner and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been duly identified by the IO.
7. As noted above, a settlement based on mutual terms between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, as also following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise in futility.
8. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.459/2023 dated 21.12.2023 registered at PS: Shahdara under Sections 323/354/509 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2026 at 12:38:37
9. As such, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 10, 2026/Ab This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2026 at 12:38:37