Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17759 (DEL)

KAMAL GUPTA & ANR. v. RAHUL GUPTA & ANR.

CRL.M.C./6728/2026 · 2026-09-10

Saurabh Banerjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010429002026 + CRL.M.C. 6728/2026, CRL.M.A. 28116/2026, CRL.M.A. 28117/2026, CRL.M.A. 28118/2026 KAMAL GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sujoy Datta, Mr. Vibhor Kapoor, Ms. Aarsheya Sharda and Mr. Abhishek Chhabra, Advs. versus RAHUL GUPTA & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Madhav Khuranna, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Ms. Riya Arora, Mr. Kartik Kumar, Ms. Kashvi Bansal and Mr. Dev Kapoor, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh, Ms. Priya Sarkar, Mr. Gaurag Kumar and Mr. Prateek Bhati, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 10.09.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek setting aside of the order dated 03.09.2026 passed by learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2026 at 12:37:49 Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (learned Sessions Court) in Crl. Rev. No. 68/2026 titled ‘Rahul Gupta vs. Kamal Gupta & Ors.’. 2. After hearing learned senior counsels for the parties at considerable length, this Court is of the considered opinion that it would be in the interest of parties if the impugned order dated 03.09.2026 is sustained as it is without any interference, albeit, with the categoric direction that the learned ACJM would proceed with deciding the two issues as set out by the learned Sessions Court in paragraph no.16 of the impugned order in accordance with law, and without being influenced by any of the observations and/ or reasonings and/ or findings rendered therein. 3. It is also made clear that the parties are free to agitate their rights/ contentions on the basis of materials on record before the learned ACJM in accordance with law. 4. With these observations the present petition, alongwith pending applications, is disposed of. SAURABH BANERJEE, J. SEPTEMBER 10, 2026/Ab This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/09/2026 at 12:37:49