IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37023 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2026 Thana- Manikpur P.S District- Arwal ====================================================== 1. Ram Chandra Yadav son of Late Parmeshwar yadav Resident Of Village -Manikpur Ps -Manikpur @ Manikpur District -Arwal 2. Ful Chand yadav son of Late Parmeshwar yadav Resident Of Village -Manikpur Ps -Manikpur @ Manikpur District -Arwal 3. Ramchapit Yadav @ Ram Chhati yadav @ Hawaldar Yadav @ Hawaldar Prasad yadav Son of Late Parmeshwar Yadav Resident Of Village -Manikpur Ps -Manikpur @ Manikpur District -Arwal 4. Hari yadav @ Harilal yadav Son of Late Parmeshwar yadav Resident Of Village -Manikpur Ps -Manikpur @ Manikpur District -Arwal 5. Shankar Yadav @ Shankar Kumar son of Ramchandar Yadav Resident Of Village -Manikpur Ps -Manikpur @ Manikpur District -Arwal 6. chandan Kumar Son of Ramchandar Yadav Resident Of Village -Manikpur Ps -Manikpur @ Manikpur District -Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shubham Samrat, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 16-06-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1, 3, 5 and 6 are persons with clean antecedent and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37023 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3 petitioner no.2 and 4 have antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that he came to know on 07.02.2026 at 9 AM that Ramchandra, Ramchhapit, Phulchand, Hari and Shankar along with unknown accused are trying to grab his land, accordingly he informed his son (Amrendra) who reached the place of occurrence at 3 P.M. and tried to stop the construction on the land, when eight named accused persons including the petitioners along with unknown accused assaulted his son causing injury and even fired. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that though there is allegation of firing but then no one was injured. It is also submitted that even the FIR has not been instituted under the Arms Act, as such allegation of firing is an exaggerated allegation. It is further submitted that allegation of assaulting the son of the informant is alleged but then from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific rather is general and omnibus in nature and on account of dispute relating to land, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is also submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that as to why the son Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37023 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3 of the informant reached the place of occurrence at 3 P.M. when it is alleged that petitioners along with other accused had come on the land and were doing construction work since 9 A.M. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No.13 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T