BABAN BARUI @ BABAN BARUI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM(M)/373/2026 · 2026-03-17
Kausik Chanda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17758 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17758 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17.03.2026 Sl. No.52 AMR Ct.No.237 Allowed
CRM (M) – 373 of 2026
In Re:An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Ghatal Police Station Case No. 194 of 2025 dated 06.06.2025 under Section 331(4)/64(2)/(k)(L)/70(1)/115(2)/126(2) of BNS,
2023.
And
In Re: Baban Barui @ Baban Bauri
….Petitioner
Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Sudip Kushari Mr. Qazi Ezaz Ahmed Mr. Dilwar Azad
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Arindam Sen Ms. Mousumi Sarkar
…for the State
It is an acknowledged position before this Court that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with the other two accused persons, who have already been granted bail by this Court.
It further appears that the victim lady was declared hostile by the prosecution in course of her deposition.
I find no justification to keep the petitioner in custody any further.
2
Having regard to the aforesaid, the prayer for bail is allowed.
Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghatal, Paschim Medinipur.
It is further directed that the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate any witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner. Failure on the part of the petitioner to comply with the aforesaid conditions shall entitle the learned trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner in accordance with law, without any further reference to this Court.
Accordingly, CRM (M)373 of 2026 stands allowed.
(Kausik Chanda,J.)