SARJU RAM (DECEASED THROUGH LRs) SITTU DEVI AND ANOTHER v. VINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS
CMP.M/893/2026 · 2026-07-28
Virender Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17751 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17751 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sarju Ram (deceased) through LRs Sittu Devi and Ors. vs. Vinod Kumar and Ors.
CMP(M) No.893 of 2026 28.07.2026 Present: Mr. Virender Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the applicants. Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, Advocate, for
respondents No.1 to 7. Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondents No.8 to 12.
Service is complete.
CMP(M) No.893 of 2026
After hearing, learned counsel appearing for the parties, this Court is of the view that the applicants has put forward the reasons, which fall within the definition of ‘sufficient cause’, which prevented them from filing the accompanying appeal within prescribed period of limitation. As such, the delay in filing the appeal is ordered to be condoned. Application stands disposed of.
RSA No. _______ of 2026
Vide order of the even date, passed in CMP(M) No.893 of 2026, the delay in filing the Regular Second Appeal has been ordered to be condoned.
Appeal be registered.
Before proceeding further, record of the learned trial Court, as well as, learned First appellate Court, be requisitioned for 08.09.2026.
(Virender Singh) Judge July 28, 2026 (subhash)
Ajay Kumar vs. State of H.P. Cr.MP(M) No.1272 of 2026 28.07.2026 Present: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Karanveer Singh, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Tejasvi Sharma, Mr. Mohinder Zharaick and Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocates General, with Ms. Ranjna Patial, Ms. Avni Kochhar and Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocates General, for the
respondent/State.
For consideration, list on 29.07.2026. (Virender Singh) Judge July 28, 2026 (subhash)