( 2026:JHHC:2258 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 454 of 2026 Nakeeb @ Montu @ Mohammad Naqueeb @ Md. Nakib @ Mintu, aged about 44 years, son of Md. Nezamuddin, resident of At Tiwari Street New Road, Rayeen Mohalla, Hindpiri, P.O. Ranchi, GPO, P.S. Hindpiri, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. 02/ 29.01.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hindpiri P.S. Case No. 79/2022, registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 120-B/295A of the I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier petitioner moved in A.B.A. No. 8177 of 2024 which was dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 25.06.2025 and thereafter the petitioner moved in A.B.A. No.5605 of 2025 which was also dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 22.09.2025 with liberty to file fresh application before the learned Court. He next submits that pursuant to that order the petitioner moved before the learned Sessions Judge for grant of anticipatory bail which was rejected. He further submits that the present anticipatory bail application has been filed on the fresh ground that co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 3764 of 2024 by order dated 02.09.2024. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits ( 2026:JHHC:2258 ) that twice the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner has been dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Considering that anticipatory bail of the co-accused was allowed in A.B.A. No. 3764 of 2024 by order dated 02.09.2024, the first anticipatory bail of the petitioner being A.B.A. No. 8177 of 2024 was dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 25.06.2025 and second anticipatory bail of the petitioner being A.B.A. No.5605 of 2025 was dismissed as withdrawn by order date 22.09.2025 and in view of that grounds of anticipatory bail of the co-accused has already been taken into consideration in A.B.A. No. 5605 of 2025 which was dismissed as withdrawn. 6. In view of above no fresh ground is made out and further twice the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. 7. However, if the petitioner moves before the learned court by way of filing regular bail the same shall be decided in accordance with law without being prejudice to this order. Dt.29.01.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-