Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17743 (PNJ)

GIANINDER PARTAP v. SWAPAN SHARMA AND ANOTHER

COCP/1836/2026 · 2026-04-21

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-1836 IN THE HI 110 Gianinder Pa Sh. Swapan CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. dated 15.01. M-1620-202 whereby re Ludhiana, P by the petiti certified cop 2. instructions representatio 3. copy of the then he subs respondents. acknowledge 1836-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o der Partap Versus apan Sharma and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Aman Mittal, Advocate for Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fi 15.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by 2026, titled as ‘Gianinder Partap respondent No. 3-SHO, Police ana, Punjab to dispose of the represen petitioner within a period of 03 week ed copy of the said order. At the very outset, learned co tions submits that the responden entation from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petiti of the representation was sent to resp e subsequently submits that physical dents. However, learned counsel wledgement was taken thereupon. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1836-2026 Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ate for the petitioner. AAG, Punjab. een filed alleging violation of order ed by a co-ordinate Bench in CRM- vs. State of Punjab and others’ Police Station Sahnewal, District presentation dated 13.12.2025 filed 3 weeks from the date of receipt of ed counsel for the respondents on ondents have not received any petitioner has first submitted that to respondents through e-mail; and hysical copy was also given to the ounsel admits that no receipt/ rder trict filed t of s on any that and the eipt/ RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.22 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1836 4. he may be p petitioner to 5. 6. 7. 8. 21.04.2026 rishu 1836-2026 -2- At this stage, learned counsel f y be permitted to withdraw the instan ner to file fresh one with better particu Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, with th Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable unsel for the petitioner submits that instant petition, with liberty to the particulars or if so advised. with the liberty aforesaid. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No that the RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.22 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.