Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17733 (AP)

Gurajala Sudhakar v. Sri Sashi Bhushan Kumar

CC/546/2025 · 2026-01-01

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010092922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 546/2025 Between: 1. GURAJALA SUDHAKAR,, C/O. GURAJALA PURUSHOTHAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D.NO- 1-33, DIGUVA MAREDU PALLI VILLAGE, VEERA BHADRA SWAMY TEMPLE, UTHARA BRAHMANAPALLE, CHITTOOR, ANDHRAPRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI KANNABABU, COMMISSIONER OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, D. NO.12-47, PVS ICON, PATHURU CROSS ROAD, TADEPALLI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI SUMIT KUMAR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SRI CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGIEER, PRI DIVISION, CHITTOOR. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 6. SRI CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, CHITTOOR. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein and punish them with maximum imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the Orders passed by the Honble A.P. High Court dated 23.10.2024 passed in W.P. No. 28297 of 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with as per the instructions furnished by the 6th respondent dated 26.12.2025 which shall be made as part of the court record. 2. In view of the same, as nothing survives in this matter, the contempt case is closed. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 02.01.2026 NNN