Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17727 (RAJ)

MANOJ KUMAR MEENA v. U O I C R P AND ORS

CW/9694/2012 · 2026-01-06

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:192] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9694/2012 Manoj Kumar Meena S/o Shri Babulal Meena, aged about 30 years, R/o Village And Post Naroli, Tehsil Wair, District Bharatpur Raj.. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Inspector General, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Kadarpur, Gurgaon, Haryana. 2. Inspector General Of Police, Northern Sector, Kerrypuble, R.K. Puram, New Delhi - 110066. 3. Commandant, HQ/121 Battalion, CRPF, Kadarpur, Gurgaon, Haryana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 06/01/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents has raised an objection that the cause of action for filing the instant writ petition has occured outside the territory the State of Rajasthan therefore, the writ petition before this Court is not maintainable. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents indicates that the penalty order dated 30.04.2009 was passed by the Commandant- 121 BN, CRPF, Kathua (J & K) and the appellate order by the Deputy Inspector General, Delhi. Both the authorities fall outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. [2026:RJ-JP:192] (2 of 2) [CW-9694/2012] 3. In support of his objection, learned counsel for the respondents has relied upon the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Eastern Coldfields Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Kalyan Banerjee, 2008 (3) SCC 456 as well as the judgment of this Court in the case of Chhotu Singh Naruka Vs. Union of India & Ors., 2005 (8) RDD 3385 (Raj). 4. In the light of aforesaid objection, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court. 5. In view of above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the petition before the appropriate Court. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/32