Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17725 (KAR)

SRI. V MASTAN v. SMT. S. MANJULA

RFA/1220/2019 · 2026-03-05

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13475 RFA No. 1220 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1220 OF 2019 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. V. MASTAN S/O SRI. V. CHINNA KULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS NO.5, 3RD CROSS NEAR MARIAMMA TEMPLE KATREGUPPA, BSK III STAGE BENGALURU-560 085. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.71, THULASIPURA MAIN ROAD ANJANAPURA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-560 062. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR REDDY G.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. S. MANJULA W/O LATE SRINIVASALU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. SMT. SANDYA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS D/O LATE SRINIVASALU 3. SMT. S. VIDYA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS D/O LATE SRINIVASALU Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13475 RFA No. 1220 of 2019 4. SRI SHASHI KUMAR AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS S/O LATE SRINIVASALU ALL ARE RESIDING AT PREMISES NO.299 SITE NO.11, IN SY.NO.6/1, AVALAHALLI VILLAGE ANJANAPURA POST, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-560 062. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S. MAHENDRA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.02.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5707/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL JUDGMENT Memo is filed reporting settlement of the dispute. 2. Along with the memo, order sheet in Execution Case No.3352/2019 on the file of Principal City Civil Court, Bengaluru is also produced. 3. In terms of the order dated 20.07.2024, the payment by one of the party is acknowledged by the other - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13475 RFA No. 1220 of 2019 party to the proceeding and the execution petition is closed as fully satisfied. 4. Hence, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement. 5. The appellant is entitled to refund of Court fee. Registry to refund the Court fee to the appellant. Pending applications, if any do not survive for consideration. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5