35-WP8785-2026.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8785 OF 2026 Chunilal Manshi Gala And Anr ...Petitioners Versus Manibhadra Lifespace Pvt Ltd And Ors …Respondents Mr. Bhanu Chopra, a/w Sakina Electrikwala and Esha Solanki, i/b Avyaan Legal, for the Petitioner. Ms. Aneesa Cheema, a/w Raju Jain, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Darshan Mehta, i/b Dhruve Liladhar & Co., for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 11th AUGUST, 2026 PC:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. When this Court expressed its disinclination to entertain the Petition, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that, the Petitioners contention is that the MoU on the strength of which the Petitioners have been impleaded as party Defendants to the suit, has expired by ef@ux of time and the Petitioners do not intend to lay any claim qua the subject property. 1/2 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.08.12 14:49:25 +0530 35-WP8785-2026.DOC 3. If that be the case, the Petitioners are permitted to Ble an appropriate proceeding on an afBdavit before the trial Court seeking the deletion of the Petitioners from the suit. 4. In the event such proceeding is Bled and a statement on afBdavit is made, the learned Judge, City Civil Court, is requested to consider the same on its own merits and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law. 5. The petition stands disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2