RC,J C.C No.553 of 2025 1 APHC010091082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] SATURDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 553/2025 Between: 1. CHINTADA VENKATARAO,, S/O. CH.GALLENNA,OCC-MATERIAL SUPPLIERS AND CONTRACTOR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O.SUBRAMANYAPURAM VILLAGE,JALUMURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SASIBHUSHAN KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL-SECRETARY TO PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT , SECRETARIAT BUILDING,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL-SECRETARY TO FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI. 3. SRI BALU NAIK, THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF ,PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OPP.PWD GROUNDS. ,GOVT.OF ANDHRA PRADESH 4. SRI SWAPNIL DINKAR PUNDKAR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT,A.P 5. SRI K G J NAIDU B E, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PIU (PANCHAYAT RAJ) DIVISION SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT RC,J C.C No.553 of 2025 2 6. SRI PATNAM CHANDRASEKHAR, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER,DISTRICT TREASURY, SRIKAKULAM,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased pleased to punish the respondents herein for their willful disobedience of the orders of the Honble court passed in WP No 19810/2023 dated 16.08.2023 by the Honble Judge Justice Ravi Cheemalapati under section 10 to 12 and 16 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 70 of 1971(Contempt of courts Act ) and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. KESAVI KUMARI NEMALA RC,J C.C No.553 of 2025 3 The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 16.08.2023 passed in W.P.No.19810 of 2023. 2. Sri. Davuluri Dilip, learned counsel representing Sri. Sapthagiri Metta, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with by the respondent authorities, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. 3. As the authorities have complied with the directions of this Court, there is no purpose in keeping the contempt case pending and the contempt case is liable to be closed. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date:31.01.2026 Ksj