Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17708 (PNJ)

RAGHBIR SINGH v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS

CWP/13150/2026 · 2026-04-30

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 131 CWP-13150-2026 Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 RAGHBIR SINGH ...Petitioner Vs. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Ms. Manvi Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Jyotnoor Kaur Sethi, Advocate for respondent-PSPCL *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to install domestic electricity connection/meter in a time bound manner. 2. The petitioner is a resident of Bathinda. He applied for an electricity connection with the respondent-authorities. He deposited requisite fee and charges but the respondents have not installed electric meter till date. He has approached the respondent-authorities for installation of the meter but to no avail. 3. Ms. Jyotnoor Kaur Sethi, Advocate has filed memo of appearance on behalf of respondent-PSPCL. The same is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.30 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13150-2026 -2- 4. On being pointed out authorities constituted under Section 42(5) of Electricity Act, 2003, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach appropriate Forum as permissible by law. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE April 30, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.30 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document