Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17708 (KAR)

SRI M SURESH v. SRI T N SHIVAKUMAR

CRL.RP/584/2022 · 2026-03-05

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13707 CRL.RP No. 584 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 584 OF 2022 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI M SURESH S/O MADIVALA MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT THYAGARTHI VILLAGE SAGARA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT- 577431 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KASHINATH J D., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI T N SHIVAKUMAR S/O NARAYANAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCCUPATION TEACHER N G N PAI SCHOOL, RESIDING AT THYAGARTHI BRAHMANANA STREET THYAGARTHI POST SAGARA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT- 577431 …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13707 CRL.RP No. 584 of 2022 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 16.12.2019 PASSED IN CC NO. 384/2013 PASSED BY THE ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT SAGAR AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE CONFIRMATION OF CONVICTION IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 10006/2021 DATED 27.12.2021 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA, SITTING AT SAGAR AS ILLEGAL. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri.Kashinath J.D., learned counsel for the revision petitioner. 2. Respondent though served with the notice of the revision petition remained absent. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13707 CRL.RP No. 584 of 2022 3. A fair submission is made on behalf of the revision petitioner that the accused has not complied the conditions of the order of suspension passed by this Court. 4. He also submits that on verification from the briefing counsel, there is settlement between the parties. 5. If it is so, the present revision petition would not survive for consideration. 6. Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28