[2026:RJ-JP:1167] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5840/2025 1. Smt Manfhuli Devi W/o Shri Choturam, R/o Village Bharvipur, Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. 2. Choturam S/o Shri Ramu, R/o Village Bharvipur, Tehsil Andhi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 12/01/2026 1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.03/2025 registered at Police Station Aandhi, District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 121(1) and 132 of BNS the accused-petitioners have preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner- Smt. Manfhuli Devi submits that the accused-petitioner falsely been implicated in this case. Custodial interrogation against the accused-petitioner No.1 is not required. The accused-petitioner No.1 is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner No.1 may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:1167] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5840/2025] 5. Considering the fact that the accused-petitioner No.1 is a lady and custodial interrogation against the accused-petitioner No.1 is not required, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner No.1 on bail. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 BNSS is partly allowed qua the accused-petitioner No.1 and it is ordered that accused-petitioner No.1 Smt Manfhuli Devi W/o Shri Choturam, in connection with FIR No.03/2025 registered at Police Station Aandhi, District Jaipur Rural, shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner No.1 shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner No.1 shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner No.1 shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. 7. It is informed by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner No.2- Choturam S/o Shri Ramu that police has submitted a negative final report against the petitioner No.2, therefore, in light of the same, the instant anticipatory bail application filed by accused-petitioner No.2 is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/156