W.P.(C) 13140/2026 $~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010425902026 + W.P.(C) 13140/2026 & CM APPL. 61072/2026 MS SIMRAN GUJRAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu B. Mishra, Ms. Tanisha Bhatia and Ms. Ananya Mishra, Advocates versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sharique Hussain and Mr. Om Swarup Kumar, Advocates for R-1/BSES YPL Mr. J. S. Rana, Mr. Milan Verma, Mr. Aman Sharma, Ms. Priya Rana and Mr. Chirag Sharma, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 09.09.2026 CM APPL. 61072/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 13140/2026 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent no.1/BSES Yamuna Power Limited (‘BYPL’) to issue a new electricity connection at House No. 130, 3rd Floor, Site No. 1, Shankar Road, New Delhi or restore the electricity connection. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/09/2026 at 17:51:13 W.P.(C) 13140/2026 3. It is stated that there is an ongoing civil dispute between respondent no.2 and the petitioner. Respondent no.2 had filed a suit for recovery of possession along with other consequential reliefs against the petitioner in which a decree of possession has been passed in favour of respondent no.2 under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 4. It is further stated that the petitioner has filed an appeal against the said judgment which is pending adjudication before this Court in RFA 87/2024. In the said suit, the petitioner filed an application seeking similar relief, i.e. grant of electricity connection which was dismissed by the Trial Court vide order dated 5th August, 2026. 5. Counsel appearing on behalf of BYPL as well as private respondent no.2 object to the maintainability of the present writ petition and submit that since there is already an adjudication on merits by the Trial Court, the proper remedy for the petitioner would be to challenge the said order or file an application in the pending RFA. 6. In the opinion of this Court, since there is a judicial order passed rejecting the application of the petitioner for grant of electricity connection, the proper course of action for the petitioner would be to challenge the said order. 7. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of while granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order passed by the Trial Court. AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 ds This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/09/2026 at 17:51:13