Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17694 (JHR)

MD SAMDAN ALIAS SAMDAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3240/2026 · 2026-06-24

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18444 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3240 of 2026 1. Md. Samdan @ Samdan, aged about 28 years, son of Md. Yusfuf 2. Md. Abdullah, aged about 44 years, son of Md. Yusuf 3. Tunnu Shai @ Aman Ullah @ Tunnu, aged about 38 years, son of Md. Yusuf 4. Nunuwa @ Abdullah @ Abedullah, aged about 41 years, son of Md. Yusuf 5. Jugunu @ Md. Yajdan, aged about 30 years, son of Md. Yusuf 6. Md. Yusuf, aged about 78 years, son of late Yakuf Shah, Above all are resident of village Bakash Pura, P.O. Bahanbay, P.S. Hazaribag, District-Hazaribag ...... … Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Sahiba Mosmat, wife of late Kaishau Sai, resident of Bakash Pura, P.O. and P.S. Muffasil, District-Hazaribag .…. … Opposite Parties -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Agnivesh Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate 02/ 24.06.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hazaribagh Muffasil P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 85, 303(2), 76, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS Act, 2023 and section 3/4 of D.P. Act, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that present case has been lodged by mother-in-law of the petitioner no.1 and earlier the wife of petitioner no.1 has lodged case against the husband and others and entire family members have been made accused. He next submits that false allegations of assault are there and there are series of litigations between the parties. He submits that injury is simple in nature. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory ( 2026:JHHC:18444 ) bail. 4. Learned counsels for the State and informant jointly oppose the prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there 5. Considering that both sides are relatives and there are case and counter case between the parties and entire family members have been made accused and further the injury is simple in nature. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, at Hazaribag, in connection with Hazaribagh Muffasil P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.24.06.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-