Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17692 (RAJ)

PARTH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CW/6757/2018 · 2026-02-17

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7455] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6757/2018 Parth Singh S/o Modho Singh, R/o Village Madanpur, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Depart- ment Of Technical Education Govt. Of Rajastha, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ajmer Through Its Secretary ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig Mr. Harendra Neel Mr. Amogh Gupta Mr. Rohan Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition is filed with following prayer:- a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the impugned order dated 17.02.2018 whereby the petitioner has been declared unsuccessful for interview may kindly be quashed and set aside. b) By an appropriate writ order and direction the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner on the basis of merit assigned to the petitioner under Merit List dated 01.08.2017 on the basis of marks obtained I competitive examination and interview and [2026:RJ-JP:7455] (2 of 2) [CW-6757/2018] accordingly give appointment in general category (despite of being candidate of SBC category as he has not availed any benefit of reservation) on the post of Lecturer Computer Engineering in pursuance to Lecturer Civil Engineering Technical Education 2014 with consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel, Mr. Krishna Singh submits that the client has already taken NOC and taken file from him, so he is not representing the petitioner. On 30.01.2026, a last opportunity was granted at a cost of ₹10,000/-, but still no one has appeared on behalf of petitioner. It appears that petitioner has filed a frivolous petition before this Court and nobody is interested in continuing the writ petition. It is also evident from the fact that on two occasions, no one was present on behalf of petitioner, and on last occasion, a cost was imposed for adjournment. 3. In view of aforesaid, the writ petition is hereby dismissed in non-prosecution. 4. Stay order dated 02.04.2018 is also vacated. 5. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /64