MOHAMMAD SHAFI MIR AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1563/2026 · 2026-07-07
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1769 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1769 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 1563/2026 CM No. (4068/2026)
Mohammad Shafi Mir And Ors.
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Hussain Rashid, Advocate
VERSUS
Union Territory of J&K And Ors.
…Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
ORDER 07.07.2026
1. The cause for which the eight petitioners are intending to maintain this writ petition may prima facie seem to be a genuine one but when they cannot relate it to themselves only and, thus, need to come in a representative writ petition by reference to the Residents of Nowgam, Rafiabad.
2. As such, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one in a representative capacity by following due compliance of the High Court Rules, 1999 and the Writ Proceeding Rules, 1997 under the aegis of Sr. No. 146 Supp. 2
which a representative writ petition is to be maintained.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 07.07.2026 Akhil Dev