Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1769 (JK)

MOHAMMAD SHAFI MIR AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND OTHERS

WP(C)/1563/2026 · 2026-07-07

Rahul Bharti

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 1563/2026 CM No. (4068/2026) Mohammad Shafi Mir And Ors. …Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Hussain Rashid, Advocate VERSUS Union Territory of J&K And Ors. …Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE. ORDER 07.07.2026 1. The cause for which the eight petitioners are intending to maintain this writ petition may prima facie seem to be a genuine one but when they cannot relate it to themselves only and, thus, need to come in a representative writ petition by reference to the Residents of Nowgam, Rafiabad. 2. As such, the writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one in a representative capacity by following due compliance of the High Court Rules, 1999 and the Writ Proceeding Rules, 1997 under the aegis of Sr. No. 146 Supp. 2 which a representative writ petition is to be maintained. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 07.07.2026 Akhil Dev