Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17688 (AP)

K R SUBRAMANYAM v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/4004/2019 · 2026-03-04

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010090642019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4004/2019 Between: 1. K R SUBRAMANYAM, R/O H.NO.17-23-6, SEETHAMPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EG DISTRICT 2. CHEKKA SRINIVASA RAO S/O SATHYANARAYANA, R/O 67-13-39/1 SUBBARAO NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EG DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EG DISTRICT, KAKINACLA 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, RAJAHMENDRAVARAM, EG DISTRICT 4. THE SUB REGISTRAR, KORUKONDA, EG DISTRICT 5. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, 5-59, R.K.SPRING VALLEY APARTMENTS, EDUPUGALLU, KANKIPADU MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue a writ, order or directions, more in the nature of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents not releasing the 2 documents taking into account the modified interim orders dated 23.11.2017 in WP No. 38674/2017 in WA No. 639/2018 Dated .25.04.2018 duly inserting the claUse in so far as it relates to that alienation shall be subject to the result of WP.No.38674 of 2017 on the part of the 4th respondent is concerned, as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malafide and unconstitutional violating Article 14, 19 p1 g and 21 of the Constitution of India, and issue consequential direction, directing the respondents to comply the directions in toto rendered in WA No. 639/2018 Dated 25.04.2018 with a further direction to issue suitable instructions to all concerned authorities to implement the modified orders in dated 23.11.2017 in WP No. 38674/2017 in WA No. 639/2018 Dated 25.04.2018 duly inserting the clause in so far as it relates to that alienation shall be subject to the result of WP.No.38674 of 2017 on the part of the 4th respondent, In the interest of justice and fair play, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To amend the main and interim relief in the interest of justice and fair play as otherwise the petitioners will be put to irreparable loss and injury IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the petitioner/respondent No.4 in the W.P.No.4004 of 2019 to file the counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Smt. S.V. Indira, learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through online, submits that she is not pressing the writ petition. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.03.2026 KAS 4 175 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4004/2019 Dated: 05.03.2026 KAS