Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17682 (CHH)

SHRIMATI NEETA PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/206/2026 · 2026-02-25

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:10102 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 206 of 2026 1 - Shrimati Neeta Pandey W/o Shri Anurag Pandey, Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Brahmpara, Shilata Ward. Ambikapur, Tehsil And Post Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, (Naya Raipur) District Raipur C.G. 2 - Commissioner, Surguja Division, Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. 3 - Collector, Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. 4 - Commissioner, Nagar Palika Nigam, Ambikapur, Post And Tehsil Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. 5 - The Project Officer, Integrated Child And Women Development Scheme, Ambikapur, Tehsil And Post Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. 6 - Kumari Anjali Dubey D/o Akshayvarnath Dubey, Aged About 30 Years R/o Shilata Ward, Ambikapur, Tehsil And Post Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title as taken from the CIS) For Applicant : Mr. Mahendra Dubey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.02.26 19:13:26 +0530 2 Order on Board 26/02/2026 1. This is an application for restoration of WPS No.2449 of 2014, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 09.02.2026. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that due to some inadvertence, he could not appear when the matter (WPS No.2449 of 2014) was called out for hearing on 09.02.2026, and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. Matter pertains to appointment of ‘Aganbadi Workers’ and it requires hearing on merits, therefore, he prays that the writ petition may be restored to its original number and it be heard on merits. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer. 4. On due consideration, for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and WPS No.2449 of 2014 is restored to its original number. 5. MCC stands disposed of.Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Ravi Mandavi