APHC010088482026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 4945/2026 Between: 1. MEDARAMITTA NARASIMHULU NAIDU, S/O. LATE M. RAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O. CHINTHAKALVA VILLAGE, PATHIPUTTUR POST, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517503. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517001. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517501. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, VADAMALPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517551. 6. R KRISHNAVENI, W/O. GAJAPATHI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.403, STREET NO.910, NEW MILITARY COLONY, MAHATMA GANDHI NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524004. 7. PEMMASANI GIRIDHAR NAIDU, S/O. P. SUBRAMANYAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O. CHINTAKALVA VILLAGE, PATHIPUTTUR POST, VADAMALAPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517551 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction 2 more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 4 and 5 in taking steps to dispossess the Petitioner land over an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in Sv.No. 16/1 of Pachikalva Village of Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati, Tirupati District, at the instance of the un-official respondents 6 and 7, during the pendency of O.S.No. 347 of 2025 on the file of the Court of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Puttur, Chittoor District, without issuing any notice contemplated under law as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of natural justice and also contrary to property rights guaranteed under Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents decist them self to dispossess the Petitioner from the land over an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in Sv.No. 16/1 of Pachikalva Village of Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati, Tirupati District as O.S.No.347 of 2025 pending with regard to same subject matter on the file of the Court of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Puttur, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant an interim direction, directing the Respondents, not to dispossess the Petitioner from his land over an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in Sv.No.16/1 of Pachikalva Village of Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati, Tirupati District, pursuant to pendency of O.S.No.347 of 2025 with regard to same subject matter on the file of the Court of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Puttur, Chittoor District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K KOUTILYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 5 and the learned counsel appearing for the 6th respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition against the 7th respondent is not pressed. Accordingly, it is dismissed against the 7th respondent. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.4 & 5 in taking steps to dispossess the petitioner from the land over an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in Sy.No.16/1 of Pachikalva Village of Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati, Tirupati District at the instance of the un-official respondent Nos.6 & 7 during the pendency of O.S. No.347 of 2025 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Puttur, Chittoor District without issuing any notice contemplated under law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5 relying upon the written instructions of the 5th respondent dated 23.02.2025 submits that the subject land in Sy.No.16/1 of Pachikalva village is a private patta land. No eviction proceedings, resumption proceedings, or coercive steps have been initiated by the 5th respondent and no notice of dispossession or eviction has been issued to the petitioner. 4 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and recording the said instructions of the 5th respondent, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The written instructions of the 5th respondent dated 23.02.2025 shall be made as part of the court record. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 24.02.2026 NNN