Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1768 (BOM)

SHRIKANT @ CHIKYA SHANKAR KAMBLE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/1849/2026 · 2026-07-31

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

38-ABA-1849-2026 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1849 OF 2026 Shrikant @ Chikya Shankar Kamble Versus The State of Maharashtra And Anr. _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Kuldeep Nikam a/w. Nishi Singhvi a/w. Hrishi Shelar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr.M.G. Patil, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. Gaurav Ugale, Advocate for Intervenor. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 31st JULY, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant,learned APP and learned counsel for first informant. 2. The applicant is apprehending arrest in Crime No. 119 of 2026, registered with Market Yard Police Station, Dist. Pune, for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 118(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023(BNS), Section 25 r/w. Section 4 of the Arms Act and Section 37(1)(3) read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act. 3. It is prosecution's case that on 19/05/2026, applicant and co- accused assaulted the first informant and his brother with intention to kill them. VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.08.04 12:01:53 +0530 38-ABA-1849-2026 (CR).doc Tikam 4. It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicant that matter is settled out of the Court. Hence, custodial interrogation of the Applicant is not required and requested to allow the application. 5. It is contention of learned APP that allegations against the Applicant are serious in nature and hence, custodial interrogation of the applicant is required and requested to reject the application. 6. It is contention of learned counsel for the first informant that the matter is settle out of the Court. The first informant has no objection to allow the application. 7. I have heard all learned counsel. Perused the FIR and documents produced on record. As matter is settled out of the Court, custodial interrogation of the Applicant is not required and I pass following order. ORDER (i) In the even of arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail in Crime No. 119 of 2026, registered with Market Yard Police Station, Dist. Pune, on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. (ii) The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required. The application is allowed in above terms and stands disposed 38-ABA-1849-2026 (CR).doc Tikam of. 6. It is made clear that the above observations are made only for the purpose of granting bail and the Trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits in accordance with law and uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. 7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)