MANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/13079/2026 · 2026-05-12
Surya Partap Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17676 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17676 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-13079
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 120
MANDEEP SINGH & ORS.
STATE OF
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:
SURYA PARTA
directions to of FIR No. 191(3) and 190 Khurd, Distri
2.
petitioner respondent No. No.2 to decide the time.
3.
13079-2026 (O&M) 8587
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
MANDEEP SINGH & ORS.
VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA
Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed by the directions to the official respondents to take legal action in a case arising out of FIR No.17 dated 06.02.2026, under Section 191(3) and 190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, , District Ferozepur.
The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the rs have filed the representation respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to to decide the representation of the petitioner
Notice of motion. 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13079-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026
.....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. as been filed by the petitioners to take legal action in a case arising out .2026, under Sections 333, 115(2), 324(4), 324(5), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Ghall sel representing the petitioner submits that the representation (Annexure P-5) before the earned counsel prays for directions to the respondent representation of the petitioners within the stipulated
(O&M) 2026
.....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for to take legal action in a case arising out s 333, 115(2), 324(4), 324(5), Ghall sel representing the petitioner submits that the before the respondent stipulated GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.12 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-13079
upon the State
5.
hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. representation of the within a period of
order. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of letter of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level.
Gaurav Thakur Whether Whether reportable 13079-2026 (O&M) 8587
Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab upon the State is hereby dispensed with.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level.
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2
Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Hence service of notice
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking order from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, representation. The respondent No shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level. :Yes/No : Yes/No
Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is to decide the by passing a speaking order from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, . The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level.
GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.12 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document